Because this post is another example where they always make themselves out to be the good guys but they have an agenda like anyone else.
So what is your argument in this case? That no one is allowed to portray themselves as the good guy unless they're 100% perceived as good by everyone?
What is wrong with their argument?
Healthy skepticism is always good, but are there organizations that go out of their way to make themselves not look like "good guys"?
Having opinions on dystopian armed robots != being a bad organisation. Also isn't being pro-privacy an agenda too? They have always opposed the US government.