Hacker News Reader

Comment by throw827474737 | Hacker News Reader

Wowowow stop.. last time I seriously looked aeons ago (4 or 5 years? :D) there was Vue as the nice smaller thing as an alternative React.. besides some other few bigger names. Noe Vue2, and Vue3? That didn't age well? And Svelte?

Omg, doing (because I need to) C or C++ stuff, where you have (or lets say you are bound to for several reasons, compatibility, regulations,..) C++11.. or even C99 .. man I feel so old and slow as I potentially am, lol.

View on HN

Spotty support for C++17/C++20 is very annoying. Maybe if you stick to one platform and one language edition on one compiler you'll have a nice and stable C++ experience, but that's no different from Javascript. We adopt new things because we want better things, having some of those things fail or quickly deprecate is a risk that comes with that territory.

BTW just a snarky aside, but I've never seen any of the Javascript frameworks make as bad design decisions as the C++11/C++14 standards committees have. At least when you use a one-day-fly JS framework you'll use something that was actually designed with a grain of intelligence.

React and vue are still going along.

Vue 3 was a big shift, like react hooks. It will take some time for community to stop whining about it, and accept old version is legacy like react classes

You don't know how good you have it to work on the backend (and I don't mean Node).

Trust me, the grass ain't greener on the other side.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com