The photographs? Photographs are almost always junk in an article, and this article was no exception, except it had the saving grace that this was his swan’s song,so why not (and there were merely three).
But it was a simple text layout for a short article. Personally I can’t complain. Hence I ask what I’m missing.
> But it was a simple text layout for a short article. Personally I can’t complain. Hence I ask what I’m missing.
Just wanted to repeat this as I entirely agree. Sure, it’s bland, but like it’s extremely readable and of all the sites to rant about UX on, this wouldn’t even make my top 1M.
(If you got Firefox click the reader mode in the right of the URL bar).
<link media="all" href="https://3skoz1yr97849dum72v8p1rj-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-..." rel="stylesheet" />
The `href` leads to a 404, hence the "refreshing" look...