Java's libraries, coding conventions and culture made it verbose more than the core language itself ever required. Starting from scratch and eschewing "good practices" it was always possible to write much leaner code. Get rid of getters and setters, make every field public and final, use anonymous classes to implement interfaces inline, that sort of thing. Obviously wouldn't pass a code review at any "serious" shop ten years ago. But look at Java 20 now, with immutable records and closures and type inference? Well now that code style is now ok! But obviously my ten year old PR is still not approved...

Depends on when you last touched Java. Lambda's (Java 8) have significantly reduced the ceremony needed to do things you'd use anonymous inner classes for. Java 14 introduced records, which makes building simple immutable data objects trivial.

It's still a fairly verbose language, but it's miles from where it was 10 years ago.

Java is much much shorter than Go, which oddly enough never gets this “complement”. So, take these boilerplate claims for Java with a grain of salt.

But to actually provide an answer, records shorten the language to a great degree in my opinion, there is also type inference with `var`, so on a local scope you can write really short code. The main method is still chatty, but it’s not like you actually have to write all that many times, plus it is just psvm for most IDE users.

The strong typing system in Java means the recommendations and general code assistance is much more accurate and powerful than that if scripting languages