Hacker News Reader

Comment by Ukv | Hacker News Reader

> It was days after and nowhere near the airport.

> [Other comment:] days after. so by musk's own rules.. fine to post. wasn't real time.

Location of the jet was shared in real-time to my understanding, checking with the link given on https://grndcntrl.net/falconlanding/

> And again, no police report filed. You were dooped.

I see a video of the supposed stalker in a balaclava. I do think Musk took the opportunity to get rid of something he already disliked, but I don't yet believe he faked the attack if that's what you're implying.

View on HN

The incident happened in a car…days after. The location is for the jet… that’s the price you pay for a private jet using public air space.

> The incident happened in a car

I believe the car was followed from the jet (possibly after the car dropped off Musk, or collected Musk's son from Musk), which was at Los Angeles International Airport earlier that day.

The car itself doesn't have a live tracker, so it seems less likely that someone dressed up in all black balaclava/gloves would find it otherwise - if it's even a known car at all.

> days after

Days after what?

> that’s the price you pay for a private jet using public air space.

A stalker attacking the car containing your 2-year-old son is NOT just a price to pay.

You’re missing that the incident in question was days after the jet landed at the airport. DAYS. There was no following from earlier that day.

My statement of price to pay was public jet location information using public airspace. This is the case for everyone. It was done for years and there’s no evidence it was a factor in the incident here despite many trying to find an excuse after the fact.

Elon's jet landed in Los Angeles on the night in question. This is easy for you to verify for yourself.

Day. The incident is now shown to have been almost 24 hours later. I was mistaken at days but it certainly wasn’t right after.

> You’re missing that the incident in question was days after the jet landed at the airport. DAYS. There was no following from earlier that day.

I could be making a mistake but I don't believe this is true. Are we looking at the same plane (N628TS)? It seems to have been at Los Angeles International Airport the same day.

It's also not particularly public information (https://archive.vn/cB7Lh). Would you defend doxxing sites like Kiwi Farms, on the basis that they're correlating/archiving public information?

Kiwi Farms isn't a doxxing site, it collects people's social media posts as receipts. Like LibsOfTikTok.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com