I think this is unfair to the founder of Binance, honestly.

SBF was a pure unadulterated scammer. He was a thief, a crook, with no redeeming qualities. The guy who picks your pocket - SBF is as bad, worse, than that.

The founder of Binance voiced some doubts about the safety of SBF's exchange. Why? Because he had some insight into it. Because he knew people had their money in it and, by staying silent, people could lose more. And because, if SBF turned out to be a scammer, he doesn't owe him 'respect' - he owes the people in the industry a warning, if he can give them a timely one.

He was right about every single suspicion he had, and when it comes to his 'criticisms' of SBF, he deserves absolutely zero blame.