Particle Lenia: Self Organising Particles
twitter.com
twitter.com
Oh, there's a link at the bottom of the paper to a project called Sensorimotor Lenia, which goes in that direction.
> These patterns can display certain properties of biological systems such as a spatially localized organization, directional or rotational movements, etc. In fact, CA [cellular automata] have a long relationship with biology and especially the origins of life/cognition as it is a self-organizing system that can serve as a computational testbed and toy model for such theories but also as a source of inspiration on what are the basic building block of “life”.
> However, while the notions of embodiment within an environment, individuality and self-maintenance are central in theoretical biology and in particular in the definition of agency, it remains unclear how such mechanisms and properties can emerge from a set of local update rules in a CA.
> In this blogpost, we propose an approach enabling to learn self-organizing agents capable of reacting to the perturbations induced by the environment, i.e. robust agents with sensorimotor capabilities.
> ..Searching for rules at the cell-level in order to give rise to higher-level cognitive processes at the level of the organism and at the level of the group of organisms opens many exciting opportunities to the development of embodied approaches in AI in general.
Learning Sensorimotor Agency in Cellular Automata - Finding robust self-organizing “agents” with gradient descent and curriculum learning: individuality, self-maintenance and sensori-motricity within a cellular automaton environment
The prime motivation for such particles is probably to achieve the highest stable energetic structure.
Senses are a higher abstraction levels of more complex structures.
Thanks for this link, this is amazing!
Coupling artificial life with machine learning seems to produce mindblowing results. I encourage interested viewers to watch the Youtube video at the top of that page, it's really great.
(via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34108745, but we merged that thread hither)
I think this field of study has wild potential.
How do you get one of these to learn a function. And further: learn to combine functions from individuals to accomplish a task?
(Ok I’ll see myself out).
Stephen Wolfram (author of Cellular Automata: ...) would agree.
> if the things you’re building the supposed life from are made up and you can’t do it in nature then you’re basically just making a video game.
It would be pretty cool to have video games with realistic artificial lifeforms...
Why would I then play with another conscious life form...
Don't do unto others what you wouldn't want to be done unto you.
How do you know you are not one of these life forms?
So I wouldn't toy with other lifeforms like that.
That's the point.
Would you kill yourself? Would you prefer to never have lived?
What if life were extremely boring unless you were being toyed with? I.e. what if being toyed with actually makes life more fun and worth living.
It seems to me that the criteria for whether it's ethical to create conscious life is not whether someone plays with it, but rather whether the created creature experiences extreme and/or very prolonged suffering.
Even then it's questionable how real and problematic those experiences are, depending on context.
Perhaps suffering is just a trick the mind plays on you to motivate you to achieve something (mental health problems notwithstanding). Perhaps suffering can be relative and/or the mind can adapt to it, depending on how the mind in question works.
Perhaps it can be more ethical to create life, even if it can only live inside a simulation.
My issue is of free will and the lack thereof.
Do you think that you'd be happy without free will?
I'd rather free will. Even if the choice is to be toyed with, the fundamental has to be free will.
It's easy to think that people would gravitate toward free will.
Their site actually does a good job of explaining this: https://google-research.github.io/self-organising-systems/pa...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm-dAvbl330
It seems like our "toy" models are getting closer to reality.
Beyond that almost everything is a system with rules - bacteria, traffic, people, etc.
By putting in rules only, you can understand emergent behaviours in any system.