That is what I was thinking, the title was pretty clear and it is a good thing (if anything, probably a larger portion of the land should stay pristine).
It's not pristine. Private owners who lock it in use the land
They need to be prosecuted if they don't let the public use public land. How is that even a question...
But for the record, I think that land-locked public land should be off-limit to anyone (aka, stay pristine).
For what? They can use it as it's public.
Prosecuted for using public land?
> To be prosecuted if they don't let the public use public land