Hacker News Reader

This is definitely not proven beyond a doubt. In fact it's fairly well documented that he was not the cause.

That is disputed, and certainly not “beyond a doubt”, unless you are speaking in an entirely personal capacity.

> Sir Winston Churchill was not responsible for Bengal Famine

I searched using this phrase and received lots of very interesting results that are in the affirmative, with lots of references from historians. I cannot rate the responses myself, nor the historians, as I am not an expert in the topic but it would seem that the topic is not settled.

I'll certainly enjoy taking a look into it and seeing what I think at the end of it.