Why is it bad if it pulls people to the reactionary? We might as well say the glamorization of cosmopolitanism is a recruiting tool for neoliberalism.
Reactionary != White Nationalist
* a reactionary government * reactionary politics"
That's about half of the people in most countries, so your argument just ends up as a sort of statement of your political beliefs.
There are more pejorative uses of the term; I guess we just end up in a semantic debate.
There are certainly places in the world where there are significant local reactionary ideologies that are not White Nationalist, but the US is not among them.
Because, and to the extent, that the thing it pulls people toward is bad.
> We might as well say the glamorization of cosmopolitanism is a recruiting tool for neoliberalism.
That's less true, though, but, yes, glamorization of cosmopolitanism feeds a bunch of ideologies that are not the same ones the “trad... ” movement feeds.
What if progressivism went too far and some reaction to that is needed to bring balance?