https://podclips.com/c/why-andrew-huberman-avoids-caffeine-f...
https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedFitness/comments/qaq6z4/dr_...
Sources should be in the show notes of the corresponding podcast episodes.
Anecdotally: I can tell the difference.
If it's not a peer-reviewed published research (actually, multiple) it's not credible.
It doesn't mean it's wrong, but presenting it as a fact like the OP did is wrong and potentially extremely harmful.
Nah, c'mon, Most of us are unqualified to synthesize the dozens (if not hundreds) of sources it takes to be an expert in a field. Saying podcasts and reddit is the same as no source is like saying "People are no source" -- it entirely depends on the person.
> Andrew D. Huberman is an American neuroscientist and tenured associate professor in the department of neurobiology and psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University School of Medicine
That's a decently trustworthy source to trust for physiological information.
I mean, do you force your GP to provide sources and then go read them before you take their advice? Even if you do, it's not advisable for the majority of people.
It's akin sayin "he's developer for 10 years, clearly nothing he said about software is wrong", which would get you laughed out of the room
Sources should be in the show notes of the corresponding podcast episodes.