So what they can just add a bunch of free content that isn't porn and get away with it? Seems like a poorly thought-out law.
So what they can just add a bunch of free content that isn't porn and get away with it? Seems like a poorly thought-out law.
The owner bought a crate of enamel pins (this [1] kind of thing, but for long-forgotten social events) from some estate wholesaler, numbering maybe 15,000 distinct pins. He put it in front of the register and gave them inventory IDs as-needed when (if?) he sold one.
[1] https://i.etsystatic.com/25263485/r/il/04c3f8/3721109924/il_...
Thanks :D
Or offer to serve "a stream of 'y' answers" for the users who do not want to depend on running a local "yes" utility. Count size uncompressed. Compress with a special "char number_of_repeats" algorithm. I wonder if this is enough to go past the current politician class...
Ya know, with the recent youtube crackdowns on profanity that might not be a bad move for them. They could create a new site as a youtube competitor, that also has all the pornhub content. Just gradually allow the top X amount of pornhub content through as regular content gets added to make sure the percentage stays consistent. I wonder if that would be enough to let them have apps on the play store and roku and whatnot.