Hacker News Reader

I highly doubt chatgpt is even remotely near being a lawyer. Lawyering is all about logical argument from a specific context and nitpicky details, which chatgpt is known to be bad at.

Anyways it probably should be illegal if someone is selling "legal services" but not doing it properly for the same reason that if a dr just did what chat-gpt said, that should also be illegal.

View on HN

What if in 10 years that version of it better than a real lawyer? 10 years is a long time in ai today

certainly won't be the transformer models (alone)

The future is unknowable. I have my doubts, but ultimately that is a bridge to cross when and if we get there. Notwithstanding how impressive chatgpt is, right now we are nowhere near that bridge so no point speculating.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com