What you won't see for a few years yet is an industry standard Economic Feasibility Technical Report - which outlines over a thousand pages or so the model of the ore, the exploration techniques used to create that model, various alternative costed plans to extract that target ore (and the value of any other material also extracted) and the expected value of the ore over the lifetime of the mining operation.
The key to this report is whether or not it's actually worth while to extract or whether it would cost more in earth movin and processing than the value of the result.
As for the tonnage;
> In 2019, Kiruna produced 14.7Mt of iron ore products [1]
this is the adjacent current mine and the location from which a drift is being driven. Iron ore would be the co-product.
For comparison;
> Western Australia's iron ore output for 2020–21 was 838.7 million tonnes, the second-highest figure after 2017–18.
ie: big iron regions (all of WA iron mines are in the Pilbara) produce ~ 57x the mass.
Bear in mind that this million tonne of rare earth oxides would extracted over a decade or more, it's not going to be a fast hit all in a year.
https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/critical-...
[0] - https://www.kitco.com/news/2022-02-07/Global-rare-earth-meta...
That's why all the early predictions for peak oil have failed, the proponents assumed "proven oil reserves" are all that's left, while we still continue to search and find more. US ratio of "proven reserves" to production is stable for around 100 years.
That doesn't really indicate how much is available in the ground, but only what's being actively mined.
Someone else wondered about concentrations of rare earth metals in the ground in this finding, and it's "unusually high: 0.18%"
My source is both paywalled and in Swedish, sorry about that, but here it is: https://www.dn.se/ekonomi/jattefynd-av-sallsynta-jordartsmet...
I archived it on the Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20230112191438/https://www.dn.se...