Hacker News Reader

> That data suggested the possibility that the updated booster might not be any more effective at preventing Covid-19 infections than the original shots.

This is a very confusing sentence. It makes it sound almost as if the original shots weren't effective enough, but that's disinformation because we know the shots were safe and effective. Does anyone have any more information about this Elizabeth Cohen in the byline and their ties to far right extremism?

View on HN

Or information about OP, who by his post history has obviously dedicated his HN life to FUD.

Love how it's a 100% guaranteed lock that whenever people dismiss something as "FUD" it's actually a legitimate concern.

> but that's disinformation because we know the shots were safe and effective

Effective?

Covid vaccines was tested and approved for a single indication, prevention of COVID-19, and they have failed miserably at that.

Everyone I know got Covid regardless of vaccination. This is also clear from national data across countries.

To quote Feynman:

> For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

It's getting hard to distinguish satire these days.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com