It's not homoiconic, which makes it not a lisp for me.
It seems to me that there isn't much there outside of proper closures and data literals? Go has those as well and it's hard to compare to a Lisp.
When JS was invented it was inspired by Scheme and apparently having those two features was more out of the ordinary then. But that's hardly true today.
But there is a _qualitative_ difference between interactive development between JS and a Lisp like Clojure. And "pretty much" is also qualitatively less expressive than "everything is an expression".
I write expression based, simple, mostly functional JS and I use tools to make that as interactive as is practical. But there's still a lot of friction and differences between that and development with a Lisp (in my case Clojure).