Perhaps humans are well-defined, but are the OP's requirements so well defined? If I train a chimpanzee to complete `foo = "` with `bar"`, is that in the spirit of the OP's wishes?
And that would be a good and insightful question and make an interesting discussion. Posting a two word comment like "Define human." without substantiating it as if the two words are supposed to communicate something very clever is not! It is lazy and presumptuous.
> Much like your response, but yet you did it anyhow
Their initial response was not lazy.
And how do you not be presumptuous in response to such a vague two word comment? A Rorschach test is not a good way to communicate.
Not wanting to play "guess the deeper argument" is not laziness. And they wrote a perfectly reasonable length response to get across their entire point, which is also not lazy.