Please stop trying to avoid the question.
Either you based your personal assertions on concrete data, or you're just a clueless troll spewing baseless nonsense.
You've repeatedly tried to dance your way out if substantiating your extraordinary claims.
Either you're able to come up with any semblance of support for your claims, or you can't. What is it?
I'm not comparing it to other operating systems. I'm not suggesting that people stop using linux. I'm suggesting that as an industry we need to take this seriously and improve the safety of the most widely used and critical piece of software on the planet.
I'm not sure you're being serious. Do you understand your list is comprised of CVEs that date way back in time as far as 2003?
You're talking about an unfiltered, uncategorized list of reports that were published in last two decades.
At least a couple of entries from a decade ago referred to fixing kernel warnings.
And that's what you chose as the single best smoking gun to support your personal assertions on C?
I want you to either substantiate your extraordinary claims regarding C's supposedly security issues along with your personal assertions regarding Linux supposedly being riddled with security vulnerabilities. So far you either desperately tried to avoid the questions or put up strawmen. Either you support your claims and present your rationale or your claims are proven to be nonsense.
Nonsense links to 20 years worth of CVEs that boil down to an average of a few dozen random issues in a codebase of over 12M lines of code is complete nonsense, and showcases the exact opposite of your original claims, not to mention that most have zero to do with C at all.
So exactly where do you base your personal assertion that C is somehow riddled with security issues? Nowhere?
People like you need to either open your eyes and think through your baseless beliefs or stop being disingenuous. The world is very different than the bullshit claims that pops up in your Twitter feed.