I don't understand why there hasn't been a widely successful crowd financing platform for open source yet.
I imagine it has to be a bit complex but it sounds like a solvable problem.
I imagine it has to be a bit complex but it sounds like a solvable problem.
Having spent some time maintaining large OSS projects as a first party engineer, these are the options I see:
- pay a fixed donation per month, a la patreon/etc. I would never do this. If I'm buying software for a company I want a real support contract, not a "I'll really try to respond to your issues with higher priority!". If I'm using software in a personal project, I want the monthly burn to be as close to 0 as possible. Also, who takes that money? What do third party PR submitters get? What do people who submit excellent issue reports with crash dumps and full debug traces get? What do first party PR reviewers get? Third party? etc. etc.
- stake money on the closing of a given issue/PR. This is better, but comes with a whole can of worms. The obvious failure mode is a third party contributor submitting a PR, the maintainer saying "eh.... I don't really agree with the way you've done this", then building it themselves. Next step on that train is a fight between the third party and the maintainer about how much influence one's code had on the other. Even if that doesn't happen, the maintainer is almost guaranteed to request changes of some sort, who decides how much the maintainer gets for their work reviewing versus the third party for their work contributing?
Not to mention the dirty little secret behind many third party contributions: if you are new to the repo, the frameworks, oss in general, etc., it is highly likely that the maintainer's work in holding your hand through contributing to the repo will far outweigh the work they'd need to put in to make the change themselves. But few would agree to paying the maintainer to accept their PR, or likely even the maintainer getting more money than them for their own PR.
There needs to be features like feature/bug-bounties that you can trust even if you don't fully trust the repo-owner/maintainer?
WAT? I pay for porn on patreon and have for years. Maybe it's just live video porn that's banned? I have no idea. AFAIK the artists I'm subscribed to are not hiding their creations. In fact they're all over sites like pornhub, spankbang, etc with their patreon address in their videos. It's all CG or real time 3D but it's most certainly porn.
We ask our company to set aside of a small amount of money each year, and we distribute it among projects we most used that year on librapay.
No fees - 100% non profit.
Probably not "widely successful", though, otherwise you would have heard of it. And the overal money flowing through it, is quite modest. The main problem is still in the minds of people, I think. If something is free, then there is no need to pay, then most won't pay (or they pay 5€ and think they own the developer now).
I think it would be best to attempt to understand what the person complaining meant by "political", (and if one dislikes using the word "political" by itself to express that idea, or if is unsure if one is interpreting correctly, perhaps rephrase the idea in one's own words, and maybe ask if that was what was meant) and respond to that.
I saw a poll result the other day, which said that, in 2020, some voters and some corporate executives were asked whether they approved of companies expressing support for political/electoral/whatever causes/social issues, and given the options of "yes", "yes, but only if directly related to the company's core business", and "no". According to this poll result, less than 40% of voters picked "yes", and almost 80% said either "yes" or "yes, but only if directly related to the company's core business". (for completeness, but not really relevant to my point : over 60% of the corporate executives polled said "yes", and under 10% said "no")
Perhaps an analogy can be drawn between these two situations?
Personally I feel more inclined to donate myself when I feel there is a reliable way for others to donate in unison with me, so that it has a chance to become substantial enough to make a difference. I think that's the value proposition of Patreon and Kickstarter.