How does this not violate the Sherman Antitrust act under illegal tying of services and goods?
> (From Wikipedia) Success on a tying claim typically requires proof of four elements:
(1) two separate products or services are involved; (AppleTV and other Apple phone/iPad, as demanded by the tied product in question)
(2) the purchase of the tying product is conditioned on the additional purchase of the tied product; (Yes, and forced only after using said hardware for its claimed fitness of playing shows)
(3) the seller has sufficient market power in the market for the tying product; (QED)
(4) a not insubstantial amount of interstate commerce in the tied product market is affected. (again, QED)