In 1951 there was a children's U-238 Atomic Energy Lab playset for $50
orau.org
orau.org
But another toy was a lead casting kit: You would melt lead in a crucible, which would then pour into a mold. http://www.girdersandgears.com/kaster.html
Never had the atomic energy kit, probably because I was already too stupid from the lead fumes out of the crucible.
Ha! Remembering back all the nights I hovered over electronics, soldering, breathing all those fumes, blown capacitors with nasty smoke billowing into a small apartment. You know you got a heavy dose of all kinds of nasty compounds when you can tell what kind of component blew by the smell only.
I cannot believe my parents let me do ANY of that. The joys of growing up in the USSR.
Dodging the acid in the lead-acid batteries?! Now that is dedication.
I raise my cup (of coffee) to you in honor of your superior talent for self-destruction.
In any case, you can easily neutralize it with a little baking soda.
This was all prominently on my mind as I broke a mercury manometer during an unofficial experiment in school and was trying to find all the little drops that exploded across the floor and hid themselves in the corners. However, I can say that it's a very efficient way to collect dust bunnies... ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp#Enviro...
Crazy stuff -- I'm still not sure how I feel about it. We've gone too far in the name of safety in some ways but in others it's needed as we learn more about the risk factors.
Regardless, my kids experience in school is profoundly different than mine -- very little hands on stuff or experiments. Hell, just going on a school field trip with your own kids requires a criminal background check...
Six bunsen burners, test tube racks built into the three sinks, and an eye wash tower in each science classroom of my youth. Yet the only thing I remember doing in four years of highschool is an over-chaperoned field trip with drug dogs and watching baking soda, vinegar, and water expand a balloon (goggles on, of course).
Might as well teach class in a Willy Wonka factory but feed us celery all four years.
There are still a few good high schools left at least.
In the 1950's, teacher labor was subsidized by the fact that it was one of the few intellectual jobs available to gifted females.
though when my brother was messing with them my father made sure we did it outdoors and with a breeze taking the fumes well away from the person pouring lead.
so we've lost the hobby of lead soldiers but we've gained 3d printers. i think we've gained overall.
Whether we have gained overall is an interesting question. If kids really learn to design and make what they want on 3d printers, that would be awesome. But many of the "improvements" since then are unfortunately mostly black boxes meant for consumption, not exploration.
One day we found what was a deuterium/water solution ("heavy water") in a storage locker and took several gulps of it to prove something stupid.
Beat that!
Otherwise, no, unless you get enough of it to saturate your tissues and cause problems due to it being denser than your biochemistry evolved to expect water to be.
An early experiment reported not the "slightest difference" in taste between ordinary and heavy water; on the other hand, rats given a choice between distilled normal water and heavy water were able to avoid the heavy water based on smell, and it may be possible that it has a different taste.
German: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleigießen English: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdomancy
If you go to the bottom of the Kaster link: Cast Number 12 was a whistle. The casting was in multiple parts, and I never figured out how to assemble it (I actually thought it was supposed to be a biplane. Probably the fumes again.)
So you were supposed to assemble this thing and then stick it in your mouth. :O
> You're probably OK.
There are those who disagree with you. :)
Valid point, I don't think a good case can be made for putting a lead whistle in your mouth.
But I wouldn't worry about the fumes. It's likely no worse than SnPb solder fumes, which don't contain any appreciable amount of lead.
When it came time for questions I asked what would happen if one of those nuclear powered cars were in a bad crash and its reactor was compromised?
The guy rolled his eyes at my teacher and said next question ;<). Later the teacher told me she thought it was a perfectly valid question and he dodged it.
Several years later that plant had a partial fuel melt down. They said no radiation was leaked but there was dispute about the official account. There was a book (and later a song) written about the accident.
[1] http://www.cracked.com/article_19481_the-8-most-wildly-irres...
and several chemistry sets
Not many people mind kids playing contact sports, getting concussions, broken ligaments, but when it comes to stuff like this is "Oh, no! Hide all the science equipment, we don't want them to burn their little fingers on the Bunsen burners".
The best part is that you set it up and back away quickly - no Estes electronic remote control firing - because they do tip over and fire sideways from time to time.
http://www.amazon.com/Scientific-Explorers-Meteor-Rocket-Sci...
The US government doesn't care much about the chemicals that might be reasonably used for chemistry experiments. The DEA watchlist is pretty specific and I don't believe the DHS/FBI/ATF are going after people buying small quantities of chemicals that have legitimate uses.
http://www.amazon.com/Images-SI-Inc-Uranium-Ore/dp/B000796XX...
http://carlwillis.wordpress.com/2008/02/20/uranium-chemistry...
Edit: I "played" with most of those as a "kid" (the radioactive kit excluded, that would have been awesome.) I put those words in citation marks because I wouldn't call it play, per se, and there's obviously an age limit. But, believe it or not, "kids" (something like 12 and up) are capable of being perfectly responsible and learning proper respect for things like using tools. Heck, in many countries kids are saddled with real responsibilities at those ages.
Receive responsibility and you will learn responsibility. But if you lived the sheltered life that typical American kids seem to live, I guess you have no way of knowing that...
We had chemistry sets and carbide cannons, played with mercury, painted with red lead, and cleaned spots off clothing with benzene. I have inadvertently taken a swig of gasoline. We played with firecrackers, cherry bombs, roman candles and rockets. We were always lectured on safety first and took those lessons to heart.
I honestly can't say that I learned anything useful from the chemistry set (although at the time I believed it was an absolute necessity, something I regret putting my parents through). OTOH work in chemistry labs as an adult confirmed that I was not inclined to that profession.
But from each particular encounter I learned interesting and useful facts which could later be tied into the theoretical frameworks of formal physics and chemistry.
Odd thing is I wasn't allowed a BB gun until I was 16! I never shot a living thing with it - it was simply fun to hit something at a distance. Anyway I'm still alive and doing better than ever.
Probably survivorship bias.
Anyway, there was also an article in the New Yorker, I believe, about a guy and his father, grandfather and his son. He put up a map and showed how much each person was allowed to roam on their own at age 6. His grandfather walked five miles for fishing. His son isn't allowed to cross the road on his own.
Doc: I'm sure that in 1985, plutonium is available at every corner drug store, but in 1955, it's a little hard to come by.
That being said, radiological material regulations are very strict these day. Back when I was working at a lab at school, I had to go through several days of safety courses before I could even be in the same room as some very weak alpha particle sources. The work I was doing did not utilize them, and the whole time the sources were locked in a cabinet.
It amazes me that this playset contained beta and gamma sources. Hopefully they were extremely weak; but still the radiation accumulates. (alpha particle sources are really only dangerous if ingested or inhaled, since outside the body, air shields against them)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon:
Radon is responsible for the majority of the public exposure to ionizing radiation.
I've also seen someone fly a Geiger counter on an autonomous quadcopter, so there's that.
Or it could just cause panic, akin to calling in random bomb threats. Terrorism doesn't really have to kill anyone, just has to scare them.
i'd say that there were at least 1-2 other experiments that would be discouraged due to health and safety these days.
This is a wonderful book because it covers so much ground and the writing and drawings give a physical sense of the topics: static electricity, magnetism, electrochemical cells, induction and capacitance, even semiconductors (cat's whisker detectors and selenium photocells).
You can build a cloud chamber with everclear and dry ice easily. If you have enough area (the size of a dinner plate, for example) it's very easy to spot muons at a rate near 1 particle every two seconds.
The problem with geiger counters is often the dead time after ionization. If you run at too high of a voltage and/or have too many particles, you risk saturation (which also isn't good for the high voltage power supplies)
Or whatever address those rosy-cheeked little scientists decided to put on the form. I remember sending ants to unsuspecting neighbors using the refill from that came with my ant farm.
(He's also running for Congress.http://www.packard2012.org/ )
That's a heck of an expensive toy!
Gotta wonder whether my toddlers will be allowed to boil water in school when they get to 10th grade.
In the same timeframe price of oil in gold stayed the same for that example. Even though it is also 100 times more in USD terms.
Currently, an ounce of gold buys you a nice suit in New York. Two hundred years ago 1 ounce of gold was enough to buy a nice suit in London. And 2,000 years ago 1 ounce of gold was enough to buy a nice toga in Rome.
Price of oil in gold fluctuates around 15 barrels per ounce since World War 2.
The list continues... the point is that gold is an excellent store of value reflecting real prices increases much more accurately than government figures (a.k.a. CPI).
Gold is money. Historically, gold has been the best indicator and instrument to gauge inflation. The CPI numbers from Government don't even come close.
At the end it all really boils down to: is the Government provided CPI number or gold better instrument to gauge inflation?
My take is that if something has worked great to gauge inflation for the last 5,000 years then it probably still measures it pretty well.
The CPI number from Government that has vested interest in underreporting inflation? (because of debt). Thank you, buy I firmly believe that is has been grossly understated for for the last 60 years, ergo my numbers probably illustrate the real increase in value of the set better.
I don't know ANY STORE ANYWHERE that takes gold as payment. That means it's not money. You can pawn it or sell it, which exchanges gold for actual money, which you can then use as payment.