> Training these models with extra data turns out to be incredibly expensive and relatively ineffective.
I can see that it's expensive, but have you tried it for effectiveness?
BTW, your approach is very cool here.
I can see that it's expensive, but have you tried it for effectiveness?
BTW, your approach is very cool here.
I've seen a few other people suggest that time tuning GPT is unlikely to give better results than just feeding the regular model a few examples in a regular prompt.
I've yet to see anyone talking about a GPT3 fine tuning project that went really for them. Maybe I haven't looked in the right places.