And by the way, why are you defending the idea of scaring the fuck out of the population with made-up lies on mass media?
And by the way, why are you defending the idea of scaring the fuck out of the population with made-up lies on mass media?
I suspect parent's point is that the story is a myth, and is demonstrably wrong.
The suggestion, and this [0] Slate article repeats it, that it was a ploy by newspapers of the day to discredit radio as a source of reliable information. I also recall it coming up on QI (BBC) a few years back.
The rest of your invective doesn't invite a response.
[0] https://slate.com/culture/2013/10/orson-welles-war-of-the-wo...
To whose benefit is it to commit arson in the sphere of public information, to cause panic and to obliterate trust in journalism?
Invective implies that this question is driven from some personal anger; it isn't. It's driven by a moral belief in the virtue of telling the truth, and not spreading rumors or lies.