> it WILL be developed no matter how much people wish it wouldn't.
Sure, but there's a value in delaying that development. Delaying harm is a valid tactic.
Sure, but there's a value in delaying that development. Delaying harm is a valid tactic.
> Sure, but there's a value in delaying that development. Delaying harm is a valid tactic.
It is a horrible tactic when your adversary has ultra-deep pockets & mountains of bodies to throw at the problem.
Whatever's being developed here has 1/10th the capability of the tech being developed in black site facilities at the behest of national militaries.
In the case that they're blocked: They'd only need one unrestricted computer to pull their libraries into & subsequently copy that onto siloed off workstations. It's not like anyone will actually care to notice.
In the case that they aren't blocked: Business as usual.
Debatable at least in case of smaller dictatorships like North Korea, Eritrea, Qatar ...
Countries like China can no doubt develop this independently, but they are unlikely to share the technology with random extremists.