It's weird reading this thread on a site where I so often read "I don't believe in invisible property." Often applied to music, movies, or art.

I'm sure it's not as simple or hypocritical as the same people saying both things. And this specific story is about a very specific subversion of intellectual property rules to make it open. But it's a little weird hearing a complete lack of "information wants to be free" when the thing being "stolen" is our work.