How can you write something like that, which shows that you 100% understand that this is racism, and then finish with:
> The fuss about it is overblown.
> white, male scientist from an affluent background
Instead of "white people can get high dei scores". Anyway this discussion always end with a Motte-and-bailey fallacy. You say something obviously racist, I call you out on it and then you retreat to a defensible argument. The only real way to fix it is to vote for people willing to fix it. Not to argue with Internet strangers about it.
I'm a white straight male and my DEI statement did not mention ethnicity or gender.
I was consistently told it was one of the best DEI statements the faculty had ever read.
I have no doubt that DEI statements get used in ridiculous and stupid ways; Academia is full of ridiculous and stupid things and that's why I left. But they do get used well at some institutions.
"Yes, you can still theoretically have a shot, you just have to be XXX% better than a {non-white-non-asian}{non-male}"
When you make it so one demographic has to grind a lot harder to get the same opportunities, you're only going to increase the gap between them.
Also this:
>so that other things being equal
Comical. So yes, all things being equal, you will not get a job vs another candidate strictly because they have the "correct" race and you don't. This is literally institutional racism. I'm supposed to tell my son that he has to study 10x harder, work 10x harder just to make sure he doesn't fall in the threshold where this DEI score won't hurt him?