> "While it is hoped this will be the case, the scientific community does not yet know if the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will reduce such transmission."
[1] https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coro...
What the FDA said, simplified, is there is no evidence either way whether a breakthrough COVID case in a vaccinated person poses a greater risk of infection to other vaccinated people, BUT past vaccinations have shown that those other vaccinated people are still protected and therefore that should be the assumption here until refuted.
Original:
Q: If a person has received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, will the vaccine protect against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination?
A: Most vaccines that protect from viral illnesses also reduce transmission of the virus that causes the disease by those who are vaccinated. While it is hoped this will be the case, the scientific community does not yet know if the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine will reduce such transmission.
> It's obvious looking at the data that vaccines reduce transmission.
Are you questioning my faith?
The Science Pope doesn't like to hear such heresy. Better watch out or else he'll sic the Science Inquisition on yo' aess!
I don't.
I know 2 people that caught covid after being vaccinated. I've never caught it. Most people I know never caught it. And it would be even worse without vaccines. Y'all are doing something wrong over there.
Anecdotal evidence can be dismissed with anecdotal evidence.
I tested myself randomly one time, no symptoms, and tested positive.
Asymptomatic infection is quite common with covid.
Individual experiences dont give any indication of population level outcomes - there is too much variability.
Some people see their cancers spontaneously go into remission but you wouldnt make a claim that cancers usually go into remission by themselves.
Your personal attack is again HN rules. And I'm not sure where you're coming from - I've been vaccinated.
This "vaccines can do no wrong" bandwagon is as damaging to science as the "vaccines are all bad" group.
They were very slow to confirm side effects (remember when people suffering with heart issues were ridiculed and ignored?).
Very slow to let everyone know that it wouldn't actually stop transmission (remember when we were told to get it to protect grandma? Or how about the messaging that 'breakthrough cases are very rare').
Very slow to reveal that effectiveness waned quite quicky.
These issues were quite obvious from the beginning. It's taken two years and only now can these be openly discussed without becoming a social pariah.
"These findings suggest that, although vaccinated and/or previously infected individuals remain highly infectious upon SARS-CoV-2 infection in this prison setting, their infectiousness is reduced compared to individuals without any history of vaccination or infection. This study underscores benefit of vaccination to reduce, but not eliminate, transmission."