So if someone wants to die this way, how do you stop them?
Lock them up and force feed them?
Lock them up and force feed them?
Yes, I understand the differences between one causing the other and in the other instance not, but it doesn't change the end results(being force fed).
I can think of examples of incredible torture that people have had imposed on them, I just don't see the relevance of the fact that it has been done before.
On 4th day person would get fewer, passes out... Skin tone changes... Everyone would be able to see this was not normal death. Coroner will have question why you did not call an ambulance... and left him there for days...
Really, gun is so much easier option. It is easy to make video that proves who pulled the trigger.
Even if it is painful, it is still their right to choose.
Your opinions are also not reflected in medical studies and surveys of hospice nurses[1][2].
I get where you're coming from about having problems with the tone of the website, and that it doesn't say "this is a nasty way to die, it's going to feel awful". But on the other hand it's trying to push for self autonomy in an area where it's criminalised.
Really laws need to change to give people options.
This charade with dry fast is way more risky for care giver. Takes several days and person would be passed out for a long time. It is like hodling your breath to die...