Hacker News Reader

> The alternative here (which would make your example work) is that dictionary lookups return some falsy sentinel value when the key does not exist, just like in javascript. In javascript, this has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

You get that behavior by using dict.get(): answers.get("I exist") returns None, which is falsy.

View on HN

Right, sometimes you want that. I suppose my point was that the definition of truthiness works well with the default, most obvious way of indexing a dictionary, which was the original complaint.

Perhaps I was a bit harsh -- that exposes an issue which does trip people up, where they use `if x:` when you mean `if x is not None:`.

Saying that, I think it's defensible in the same way. The fact that you can write `if x:` (where x is not a bool) tells you that the language has a concept of truthiness, and so maybe you should have a think about what that actually means.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com