Hacker News Reader

Comment by cardosof | Hacker News Reader

I wonder why people just can't be completely honest and say something along the lines of: "look, rising interest rates makes leaving money in the bank way more attractive than spending it by having x% more employees doing things that we were not sure if contributed directly to our financial KPIs. It was cool while it lasted but right now we're just keeping the cash cows and what they need. Thanks"

View on HN

Revenue growth rate was > 50% per year when most of these people were hired. Now they project 20% growth. That has more impact that wanting to earn interest on a savings account.

Yes, interest rates, all these businesses see what’s coming. Get ready for a report signifying a slight rise in inflation tomorrow.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34774930

If you are wondering why the stock market is up today it’s because it’s going to be down tomorrow. It’s the pump before the dump.

what’s financial benefit of being that direct?

It also seems worse than that based on other replies in this post.

Twilio has only had one profitable quarter in its entire existence. Both the business model and strategy are clearly broken.

I do wonder (read: hope) if this means the next wave of tech companies will be more private/lifestyle focused. 37Signals had a great article about this:

https://37signals.com/why-we-choose-profit/

Not every company needs to be a market leader, what's wrong with having a drastically smaller size (say <200 people, a number plucked from thin air) and decent revenue?

there’s nothing morally wrong with that

that being said i don’t know any investor that wants to invest in companies that are middle of the road

most employees want to work for winners

we may not want that to be true but it tends to be

if you’re not first you’re last

I mean shouldn't there something a little wrong about not running a profitable business for nearly a decade and that the only people who seems to be "winning" are those that took advantage of a relaxed monetary environment and cashed out during the IPO?

Why does money trump this?

I absolutely disagree that most workers want to work for "winners." Most workers want to have a stable job and a life of meaning outside the company. These companies are not stable at all.

There's none, quite the opposite. Apologies if my previous post is a lame snarky comment, the real criticism is that texts about thousands getting their jobs cut due to "environment changes" often show very little effort to define and quantify what's the environment and which were the changes.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com