Hacker News Reader

The proof by authority criticism is for the implied "I've been right in the past (I even got awarded for that) therefore I must be right now as well".

> What’s next - Einstein’s Nobels are also proof by authority?

If you use them as an argument for Einstein's later work, then yes. Einstein's later work for example for black holes was completely wrong.

View on HN

>The proof by authority criticism is for the implied "I've been right in the past (I even got awarded for that) therefore I must be right now as well".

Or, you know, rather merely the implied:

"I'm just some random conspiracy theorist, some fresh of the bus aspiring journalist, or some blogger that got in over their head, I've got a proven track record of working with diffucult and covered/denied stories, being proven right, doing succesful investigate journalism, and bringing up major stories. Pulitzer level track record."

Good points and I mostly agree here… important to have healthy skepticism but I still don’t think previous well-deserved recognition should be deemed irrelevant in areas where trust plays a big factor (like where where anonymous sources can’t be verified).

If there are verifiable counter-claims/evidence then that’s where the action should be.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com