A lot better than the asses at Fox. Just look at the malice dripping from this fox article:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/18/wikipedia-goes-dar...
"My main concern is that it puts the organization in the role of advocacy, and that's a slippery slope," said editor Robert Lawton, a Michigan computer consultant who would prefer that the encyclopedia stick to being a neutral repository of knowledge. "Before we know it, we're blacked out because we want to save the whales."