> "But if you can be cute and get the same point across, it's usually better to be cute."
Why exactly? The entire point of the article and the many comments here are about how subjective, useless and usually aggravating it is.
Why exactly? The entire point of the article and the many comments here are about how subjective, useless and usually aggravating it is.
Lack of emojis doesn't mean PR driven corporate speak either, and in fact both are on same level of equivocal communication.