A LLM trained on a corpus of data so large that it essentially represents a random, un-directed sampling of substantially all (written down, largely in English, and Internet-accessible) human thought, and the author sees a left-leaning bias in the model, rather than the statistical mean simply being found left of _him_… and his response is to cherry-pick the Overton window _towards_ his tribe’s inherent delusion?

Confirmation bias truly is powerful… ChatGPT already exists solely to parrot back to you the statistically most likely thing a human would say, and you want to bias it to speak more like your personal statistical deviance from the mean.

That mirror doesn’t reflect what I want! Must warp the mirror until it does.

:facepalm