I like how job "losses" makes it sound like Meta just misplaced or otherwise can't find the jobs. The right way to say it is "tens of thousands are justifiably angry at being fired while the investors and senior execs continue to rake in the profits"
Somehow I don't think The Guardian is running cover for Meta. Or any large company.
The phrasing centers the workers who lost their jobs.
Meta lays off thousands. Mike loses his job.
I get crap from people when I change the headlines, so I do it very little except when the headline is too long.