Hacker News Reader

This is why supporting things like zlibrary is important.

One of the arguments I heard in favour of copyright was to give a financial incentive to preserve and maintain old cultural works. Lol guess that theory is out the window.

This entire debacle is only possible because of the publishers.

View on HN

It will be interesting when these works as originally written and published enter the public domain, and the altered versions remain in copyright.

I predict that there will be an audience for reading the originals, and a market for brand new updated versions that are more skillfully done (perhaps by a bylined author), but that these specific (and rather ham-handed) publisher-edited versions will be quickly forgotten.

If I understand it correctly, the version entering the public domain would also include the author's own editions (as the limit to copyright of an author is 70 years). In Dahl's case, he had removed some elements that were offensive already in the 60s-70s - think Oompa Loompas as slaves from Africa paid in cocoa beans in his first version. So you would have the still colorful and probably somewhat controversial author versions go into the public domain, and the sanitized versions remain on the publisher side if authored by someone else with new copyright running etc. I agree with the prediction that both types of versions would probably find an audience, and would also predict that kids would probably gravitate towards the version that is the most lively and colourful.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com