Does it annoy anyone else that the title says "Musk's Starlink"?
Yes, it was his idea and he is the main driving force and owns half of the company, but any project like this is a collaborative effort between tens of thousands of people.
Yes, it was his idea and he is the main driving force and owns half of the company, but any project like this is a collaborative effort between tens of thousands of people.
Look at any recent disasters caused by companies, such as recent train crash with a toxic spill, boeing Max scandal, BP oil spill, 2008, anything.
Where has the CEO been personally punished?
Or does your idea of 'blamed' mean people will write something mean on twitter?
the press announce ment where CEO of Boeing took full responsebility for Boeing Max failure, CEOs of major banks took reaponsebility for 2008,
In this case, being blamed means that everyone will attribute the failure to him personally and say more nasty things about him and people will stop investing in his companies.
It would probably also quarter his net worth.
That's how much responsibilities too rich people have: it's cheaper for them to go the illegal way and screw those who worked for them.
"The fines will be handed out in such a way that obeying the law would have been cheaper as estimated by people who don't really have a way to know."
-> That's how lobbying works: people on both sides argue, and some rule decides for something in the middle. It's not exactly a formal proof.
The other day I saw an article referring to Twitter as "Musk's Twitter" which was even weirder because IIRC none of the content of the article was actually about Musk.
You named the reason. Another is that Musk is incredibly high profile.
High profile individuals accrete accolades and renown. If you don't like it, stop working for someone else and build your own startup. (I mean this in the sense of encouragement.)
They are good at it
https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-ci...