Isn't there a probabilistic nature to ChatGPT replies? So even if a student finds a response that gives a correct proof, that doesn't mean it'll work every time. Or am I wrong here?
I've asked students to share their full dialog, both prompts and replies, so the whole class gets to see; and I'll invite one or two to talk through their attempts. This is all just a trick to make students engage with "how do you you spot bugs in a proof?", hopefully more than they would from just reading CLRS! Often, students engage well when they're hearing the material from other students.
Edit: I was not in any way rude nor saying anything incorrect.
If you want to see how to do what I’m talking about, here’s an almost finished article describing the above:
https://github.com/williamcotton/empirical-philosophy/blob/m...