> The American Civil Liberties Union, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, and the law firm Cooley LLP represented the Wikimedia Foundation in the litigation.
Their counsel is irrelevant to the question of standing.
I think it does provide a little bit of color to the reasoning. The ACLU is very direct in what they stand for.
Standing here would be about whether Wikimedia or their members is aggrieved or injured, etc. The poster to whom you replied is wondering how the org would meet the legal requirements.
Ahh I misunderstood your comment. That does makes sense.