Reddit is experiencing a partial outage
redditstatus.com
redditstatus.com
Tbh I look forward to the day I can cut that time sink out. I just can’t peel myself away entirely.
Legere for Reddit has been recommended by my colleagues that use Windows but I can't vouch for it personally.
This is such a usability disaster relative to old.reddit, and it hasn't been fixed for years. Who is this for? I still remember when Reddit had one of the best mobile websites, before they had an official app and then mysteriously the mobile site started to lose previously working functionality.
But I wonder how this result was actually accomplished - are there Reddit developers deliberately adding JS bloat so scrolling is choppy? Are there KPIs that pages must not load in under N seconds or videos must not play successfully more than N% of the time? It's bad enough that it can't be an accident. I'd love to interview one of the devs of the new UI.
It is like login in to Gmail on a new computer. It has some 2fa that begs for my phone number and the other options just don't work half the time.
Anybody want to guess root cause?
Do we have a "root cause" bingo card?
DNS
Database
What else are super likely?
I often have to work hard to convince people of all experience levels that it's the best way forward.
- "It's just a little bug I can just fix it [and definitely won't make it worse with code that I haven't tested as rigorously right?]"
- "My KPI/bonus/project plan relies on this going out today"
- "My code is fine it's the infrastructure [that I didn't warn] that can't handle it. They need to fix their side now."
I don't know about your VP but "how fast can we get back to before it was broken?" is reasonably the first thing you should be asking
Doing #1 puts some serious boundaries on how bad it can get
Busted API deployment?
Before finding out the dead simple failure mode and fix, engineers need to spend countless hours diving into the most technically complex scenarios that might be happening but are irrelevant. Then they can reset permissions or add disk space or add back a DNS entry.
Won't save you if someone's running-as-root reporting job goes rogue and fills up the disk, though, while the file might... I mean, obviously one ought not have done that in the first place, but the real world is a whole thing.
However, you make it sound like it happens all the time. In reality, it happened literally just once (multiple comments, but all within one hour), the edit itself was made obvious on purpose, and it has never happened again (it's been almost 7 years since then).
For additional context to what happened: the CEO replaced his own username (u/spez) in a few comments on r/the_donald (that were just variations of "fuck u/spez") with usernames of r/the_donald mods.
Again, I have a very low opinion of Reddit leadership team and their direction in general, but "CEO editing user comments" is not a concern I have about the website at all. Mostly because it was an isolated incident that happened over half a decade ago.
how do you know exactly?
What concern would there be anyway? Like, who cares if someone edits your comment? It is not like you are storing your important life's work there – or at least I can't see it being a good idea to store your important life work there, even without tampering. Providing long-term durable storage is not the business they are in.
I've never had a report against me, I never post anything remotely spicy, I never even argue or flame. I moderated multiple subs.
And yet my 9-year, paid Reddit Gold account was randomly nuked. No explanation. Appeals denied. Support emails never answered.
I guess if your servers can't keep up, one way to cope is to just ban the folks who contribute the most to your site?
However I do often wonder what in the world is happening at Reddit HQ. Mitigating server load by banning users isn't too much sillier than some of their actual decisions.