Wikipedia is interested in being an online encyclopaedia. They are not obliged to accommodate the needs of AI researchers unless they want to.
> "Wikipedians like Knipel imagine that ChatGPT could be used on Wikipedia as a tool without removing the role of humanity. For them, the initial text that’s generated from the chatbot is useful as a starting place or a skeletal outline. Then, the human verifies that this information is supported by reliable sources and fleshes it out with improvements. This way, Wikipedia itself does not become machine-written. Humans remain the project’s special sauce."
https://slate.com/technology/2023/01/chatgpt-wikipedia-artic...
This might create a kind of structural-organizational conformity in all articles, which doesn't sound so great.
Feels wrong to me.