Also investing the time in creating some more impressive animations would really sell this to people. If you don't have the knack for it yourself, outsource it to a designer or, dare I say it, make a competition out of it.
Also investing the time in creating some more impressive animations would really sell this to people. If you don't have the knack for it yourself, outsource it to a designer or, dare I say it, make a competition out of it.
Anyway, I hear what you say about the need for impressive examples. I don't have the talent for that; my current examples are certainly not too interesting.
I guess I'll have to invest some money into it... (Since Radi is free, it's not making me anything, and so far it's been strictly a hobby project. Maybe it's time to take it a bit further.)
Here's a screenshot: http://radiapp.com/radi-windows-sshot-20110805.jpg
I haven't looked deeply at Edge since the initial release. One fundamental difference is that Radi's output is completely custom rendering into either <canvas> or <video>, while Edge uses CSS for animation. I wrote a blog post about that with lots more detail: [1]
Although there's some overlap, the approaches are basically complementary. Hence I'm hoping to make Radi into not so much a competitor to apps like Edge and Hype, but rather a more creation-oriented tool that can be used together with these other apps that focus more on building entire sites.
Now that e-books are becoming basically HTML5 packages, I'm hoping to find some opportunity for Radi in that market as well... But I haven't done any deeper research into that yet.
[1] http://lacquer.fi/pauli/blog/2011/08/why-radi-uses-canvas/