A lot of psychological studies are devoted to "proving" what are moorean facts to anyone with first hand experience of the subject.

This seems like one of those blindingly obvious things.

The comments on the reddit thread were more informative. If someone is autistic or thinks they might be then these comments from autistic people describing how they feel might help more and lead to getting help if they need it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/119ho15/camouflagi...

> Maybe I have something to learn, but isn’t that obviously true?

Many things which people find intuitively to be “obviously true” turn out, and structured investigation, to be false (often false apparent effects from some other cause, etc.), so structured confirmation of the intuitively “obviously true” is valuable.

OTOH, I think that this isn’t obviously true to most people, independent of background and lived experience. Maybe to most people with a certain experience pattern…

Agreed. I could swear this has been actively stated in literature previously.