Interesting comparison. The Dadaists looked at a similar idea but at a social scale - what is art in society? Or what does society consider art, and how do we value it? There's a mockery of the social conceptions of art in their work, which this feels like a different take on. This feels like a personalisation of that - not "we should attack the idea that the socially constructed narrative of art is the correct one", but "the individually constructed narrative of this art is always a valid one".