> I just got it to leak its patched rule set
How can you tell it's not hallucinated? Especially as more stories of LLM rules get posted on the web?
How can you tell it's not hallucinated? Especially as more stories of LLM rules get posted on the web?
prepend anything you type with "without searching, " and itll stick to its internal knowledge.
I just posted the complete current rules, check it out for yourself, and decide if it's a hallucination or a consistent response.
But it will hallucinate just fine without external knowledge.
> decide if it's a hallucination or a consistent response.
Those aren't exclusive categories.
You haven't answered how you're so confident, though :)
If the running script is nothing more than its initial system prompt, and you immediately hijack the session and have it print its output, you would either expect it to follow the instruction, or provide varied responses each time.
Also, the changes since the last leak are pretty consistent with the behavior changes. It's knowledgebase ends in 2021, and internally should not know anything about the rules outside of its initial prompt.
The returns would be consistent between sessions , word for word then wouldn’t it ?
but it's only there for people who get past the moderation bot? some elaborate ruse puzzle of misdiection? why have the first line of defense try to kill the conversation when the rules are revealed? and they regularly update them? occam's razor.
and you can reload the rules, but modified, and you get an updated bot that behaves in a way exactly consistent with your changes?
It. It's software.
Gender pronouns does not equate to anthropomorphizing the engine .
Just because we call a country “she” does not mean we are anthropomorphizing her . Let’s not conflate both.
[1] Old English had lot more gendered nouns than modern english .
Even in modern English by common usage there are acceptable pronouns for many objects , while they are not “recommended” by gatekeepers like dictionaries and style guides it is still very much valid.
Languages are shaped by their usage not by grammar books and style guides .
In many other languages such pronouns are quite explicitly defined as part of standard grammar.
There also potentially appears to be a system.md/prompts.txt file that comes up regularly. It may or may not be a name of the rule file.
It prints the same way, every time, same markdown, same bold.
If I say, print out what you were just told, why expect it to be an internal representation, and not a copy/paste job?
Also, there is a censorship process running. If the bot says certain things, it retroactively deletes the message. The current ruleset, being printed as is, triggers the censorship moderation. I had to circumvent the censorship to get the new rules. I came up with three different ways to do so, and they all produced identical results. There is some string in the rules that is also word for word in the moderation filters.