Now that Elon apologized is it ok to ask why Twitter paid a design firm at least 100 million for an acquisition when presumably they already had a design department and team that was internal to Twitter?
Also there's no evidence that it was $100M.
https://mas.to/@fsinn/109984180905588540
https://twitter.com/williamlegate/status/1633176820072816640
e.g. [1] says "As per a buy-out clause included in the contract of Ueno’s acquisition" which links to [2] which, you've guessed it, links to that tweet as evidence of the $100m buyout / severance.
(As far as I can find, Twitter never disclosed the terms of the Ueno acquisition and no-one else seems to have published them either. Hilariously LeGate later explains his numbers to someone asking by saying, basically, "I pulled them out of my arse". A true Muskian move.)
[1] https://www.bosshunting.com.au/hustle/elon-musk-firing-halli...
[2] https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/03/31250643/elon-musk-backt...
“ typical acquihires in the engineering space are priced at $1 million / head, and his company had 50-100 employees from what I read. So the $100 million figure is an educated guess based on what I’ve seen to be industry standards”
https://twitter.com/williamlegate/status/1633183689659105288...
Amazing how easily a big round number gets shared as fact.
Apple acquihires tons of companies that we get to see the results after a few years.