Hacker News Reader

Comment by ggm | Hacker News Reader

Completed in 2008. It's 15 years old and already undergoing refurbishment.

That's the nature of steam. 15 year boiler recertification, which is effectively a refurb. Hours in service don't matter for those.

That's absolutely right but boilers aren't the only thing to wear out. With so many moving metal parts, despite an automated lubrication system delivering oil to most of the surfaces even the best designs of steam loco will shake themselves to bits before long. The regular expansion/contraction cycles as it's warmed up for work and cools down after also put a lot of stress on the metal.

Sixty years ago refurbs would be much of the work going on at any large railway works - taking engines apart, stripping them down to the chassis and reassembling almost a new one in their place. The ingenuity today's preservationists demonstrate in doing this without any of the facilities of a plant is truly a thing to behold.

(Source: some of my family restore steam engines. I once tried to drive one and I was terrible.)

> Sixty years ago refurbs would be much of the work going on at any large railway works - taking engines apart, stripping them down to the chassis and reassembling almost a new one in their place.

Here's the process.[1] This had to be done every 120,000 miles or so, which is every 1-2 years. On top of that, there's a few hours a day of routine daily maintenance.[2]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ3AN-kd66g

I should have been less terse. I only wanted to point out its 'old news' -but I love steam, and whilst I love prosaic diesel shunters as much, I do love steam.

I wish they'd do something a bit more streamlined like "Mallard"

It would be sacrelige to some, but I'd like to see a new loco have a go at the steam speed record.

If all goes well, the new Pennsylvania T1 should be able to beat it. There are stories of the PPR T1's significantly beating Mallard's record, some say over 140 mph, but that the railroad was too busy to officially beat the record.

See https://prrt1steamlocomotivetrust.org for more info on the new Pennsylvania T1 locomotive that's being built.

And the fun discussion in all railway preservation forums is...which is the truly representative Flying Scotsman? It's quite amazing how hostile those debates can get for a loco that in its life of non-preservation use was transformed so many times as an operational steam engine. It's the loco equivalent of The Ship of Theseus.

Me? I don't care. It's a nice thing and I enjoy seeing it in whatever form it may appear as. Personally I like the tender that has a corridor from the first coach through to the engine plate. That seems quite nice for the driver and fireman to have delivered more than just some eggs and bacon cooked on dirty shovel :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com