1. Pay attention to God, a lot, and don't make him jealous 2. Uphold patriarchy 3. Don't murder/steal/lie*
None of those things are 'loving', and the only true absolutes (the ones God doesn't revoke when he gets a bit pissed and commands followers to smite whole people's for offending him somehow) are the 'worship God' and 'uphold patriarchy' parts.
Jesus was a Great PR guy, but for everything he did to make the big guy look good, he still ended up getting tortured to death for lulz and never got Daddy's love (why hast thou forsaken me?).
Honestly a true reading of God is a sadistic narcissist and it makes the most sense. If an omnipotent being actually cared about us he wouldn't give a bunch of conflicting information all the time and watch us hurt each other and let babies die of AIDS...and he damn sure wouldn't have tortured his own kid to death.
* Unless God tells you to...
Basically, The Church == Paul, and Paul never met Jesus.
If you want to say that 'The Old Testament' is 'people's misunderstanding of things back in the day', then you can also say that 'The New Testament' is a do-over with Paul incorporating as much stuff as possible to appeal to the people of his time. Jesus never wrote a word of it.
If anything could be 'from the mouth of God' it is the Old Testament, and it is the only thing that actually seems to have any logic to it. The NT stuff is just nonsense because it all comes down to if God is all powerful then he is CHOOSING not to act in certain ways which make him IMMORAL and therefore God cannot be the basis of a good morality. Take that for what you want, but if you read it with any rationality it has to be that way. Now, if you want to be Christian for all the good things it espouses -- great! But don't try to convince me that it isn't nonsense.
> I'm not sure where you get that the church == Paul
I meant more like, Paul is responsible for the shift from the Jewish bearing to the Gentile one. He preached to the Gentiles and made the religion palatable for them. He got into huge fights with the other Church founders about this, and was treated very harshly by the Jewish authorities who would beat him and kick him out of their towns.
Here is an excerpt from the well regarded 'The Rise of Christianity' by WHC Freund[0] (page 110):
"By 64, however, the new religious movement had taken root. Without detracting from the work of Peter, John, and the other disciples in the decade following the crucifixion, the credit belongs to Paul. Jesus was indeed the very ground of his being, but Paul had never experienced Jesus’ ministry, and his interpretation of it gave Jesus’ message a new and unex¬ pected dimension. He transformed the proclamation of God’s kingdom to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt. 15:24) into a world move¬ ment. Despite all handicaps, Paul judged precisely the prevailing mood of very many fellow Dispersion Jews. The Galatians, as we have seen, re¬ ceived him with rapture (Gal. 4:14). On the mainland of Europe the Chris¬ tians of Philippi were devoted to him. He offered a religion which, though basically Jewish, was stripped of the encumbrances of the Mosaic Law and its Pharisaic interpretations, a religion that had sufficient in common with Stoic ethics and the worship of the mystery cults to attract adherents on the outer fringes of the synagogue and even beyond. The ideal of a community in which there was neither bond nor free, Jew nor Greek, but which was united through love in a Savior (cf. Gal. 5:6), and freed thereby from the Law, the power of fate, and the malevolent astral lords of time, could also become the ideal of many of the inhabitants of the Greco-Roman world. The Savior whom Paul preached was not a savior god of current pagan myth but a historical figure invested with deity."
* https://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=743C87B7EF43F2FBA7F3EC6...