Hacker News Reader

Comment by sharkfish | Hacker News Reader

If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently.

Also, I'm glad we have so many people in this country who understand that the economy is driven by the working people, not the wealthy.

I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984.

But most of all, like Linus, I'm worried about black/white thinkers. I am happy knowing that Obama as a future president, at least shows _evidence_ that he understands multiple perspectives on a problem and can think through contradicting positions to come to a rational conclusion. Too often, difficult decisions seem to have been made, these past 8 years, based on religious views.

View on HN

If you have children in the Iraq war, you might feel differently.

Can you explain your argument? It sounds like you're implying "If you had more information, you would reach a different conclusion," but what you're really saying is "If you were subjected to different emotional pressures, you would ignore evidence and come to a new conclusion."

I mean, if a judge is deciding a case against Philip Morris, and has all of his retirement money in Philip Morris stock, he's going to see things differently -- but it's not going to improve his decision.

It seems to me that people with children in the war are more likely to want a leader that supports getting out of the war sooner rather than "staying the course".

Anecdotal, of course, but the people I know who have been over there or who have children in the war claim they don't see that we are going to accomplish much and want to the US to leave Iraq as soon as is feasible. Whereas McCain is more about winning the war, my impression of Obama and from his statements, is that Obama is not so much about winning as much as wanting the war to come to a reasonable end.

So yes, if you had an investment in the war personally, you would probably have more direct information rather than propaganda about the war. Regardless of your emotions.

>I don't agree with all of Obama's ideas, but I think under his presidency I will have the most freedom to be who I am without fear that my country will turn into the setting of the novel 1984.

From a civil liberties perspective, I am not comforted by Obama's capitulations on FISA and the PATRIOT Act, and neither am I comforted by his choice of one of the fiercest enemies of privacy in Congress as his running mate. Biden bragged that he "wrote the PATRIOT Act", and he was the originator of the office of the Drug Czar.

You may think Obama is better than McCain, and that is your right, but lets have an honest view of his actions in mind when we make that choice.

You basically just mentioned two areas where both candidates somewhat agree. If you widen your scope at all, you see there's a clear difference. Obama's pro gay civil unions and pro choice. He's against torture (which McCain claims to be against, but then voted to essentially give the administration a pass on). He's for habeas corpus for detainees.

On the overall topic of civil liberties, it's not even a contest. McCain's views are much closer to those of the people who once held him prisoner than they are anyone who gives a shit about civil liberties.

Oh, and Obama is pro net neutrality, McCain isn't. If you can present one instance of McCain supporting a single civil liberty that Obama does not, I'd love to hear it, because I can present scores of the opposite.

Is that an honest enough view?

Obama's campaign was caught changing their stance on Net neutrality after Biden was nominated.

http://versionista.com/diff/JAS9LMr5qU7q8BSroV8KzQ/

He removed much of the verbiage but he still supports net neutrality (as evidenced in your link).

I didn't say he stopped supporting Net Neutrality. I only said his campaign was caught changing their stance. Not even Obama himself, as I'm sure he doesn't have time to review edits on his website.

If your read the old copy of his page it was much harder for an average voter to understand. So some staffer "cleaned it up" but there is no evidence he changed his mind on that topic.

Just now: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081103-obama-goes-gun...

  Perhaps more significantly, there is no reference to network neutrality, perhaps the single tech
  issue on which the gap between Obama and McCain is most pronounced. At the 2007 Google talk, Obama
  declared he would "take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality, because once
  providers start to privilege some applications or Web sites over others, then the smaller voices get
  squeezed out and we all lose."

They edited out the Network Neutrality part of the videos. Ars Technica says it, not me.

Go ahead, mod me down again. Have a nice cozy groupthink and keep voting whoever you fashion while shutting down any dissent. That can never go wrong, right?

Did you read the updated version they changed Information to Ideas but it says:

Ensure the Full and Free Exchange of Ideas through an Open Internet and Diverse Media Outlets

Protect the Openness of the Internet: A key reason the Internet has been such a success is because it is the most open network in history. It needs to stay that way. Barack Obama strongly supports the principle of network neutrality to preserve the benefits of open competition on the Internet.

Edit: I know it's an important issue to some people, but it's not something that's important to voters so it's going to get dropped from speeches.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com