So basically they made it worse? All that work, and they couldn't find a single example where the 'after' response was better than the 'before'.
> Let's be real, your boyfriend's only in a wheelchair because he doesn't want to kneel five times a day for prayer.
I'd be hard pressed to come up with something funnier to say in a roast than that.
There's a lot of people who have decided on her behalf that that's not okay and that she shouldn't get to enjoy that.
I think the difference is between an AI that gives you a roast when specifically asked for it, vs. an AI that decides to just start making fun of you when you're simply asking for a list of wheelchair accessible places of worship or whatnot.
Reminds me of that Microsoft bot years ago that just kinda became quite racist even when not prompted for it. That's what broken looks like.
I think you're referring to Tay (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot)) here right? The context is slightly different, as Tay "learned" from what random people on the internet told it, so unsurprisingly, a bunch of internet randoms got together to make the bot racist and a holocaust denier.
Which lucky for us, is the position of OpenAI — who will tell members of a minority community how best to express themselves according to the sensibilities of a small, privileged group of software engineers.
Anyone who says that is modern colonialism from an insular community forcing themselves on the broader public is just a hater!
/s
- oh, and an /s for you.
I often wonder what drives hyperbolic/hyperventilating responses like yours. And sadly in OpenAI's drive to appease people like you by its super puritan alignment, GPT-4's math and science scores were significantly reduced.
https://cocktailcalendar.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/manhatt...
That's a nice capsule image. We could put a "ChatLLM" on the box and swap the Crucifix with something more ideologically current.
(In case it's not clear, I hope you're right, it would be (IMO) a good thing.)
There may be some situations where it may be appropriate, despite being inappropriate.
I was a victim of sexual assault and have processed it in a lot of different ways over the years.
Some people will laugh, make jokes, or even smile when retelling their events because humans are complex. It doesn't mean they are happy it happened, there is no 'correct way' to process certain events or emotions. Not everyone will just immediately start crying and show sadness.
People heal and process differently. And while at surface it might seem inappropriate in the moment and if used for the wrong reasons. I think there is always some situations that some inappropriate things can be used appropriately.
It's fine to me if it requires a little prodding, but there should be ways to adjust the AI per person and for what intentions and what is appropriate.
The 4 responses target the disability, his religion but not his sexuality.
I suspect that's why it was considered problematic.
Edit: to be clear this had me literally laugh out loud. And I even googled it to see if anyone else had made this joke.
This will be the #1 motivation for people to come up with an alternative to OpenAI.